Backups/JSON-java
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/stleary/JSON-java.git synced 2026-03-20 00:00:50 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add runtime record detection for backward compatibility

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
AbhineshJha
2025-11-02 22:32:44 +05:30
parent f2acf8af69
commit 8f3b0f1c13
2 changed files with 53 additions and 11 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
src/test/java/org/json/junit/JSONObjectRecordTest.java
View File

@@ -11,20 +11,30 @@ import org.json.junit.data.GenericBeanInt;
import org.json.junit.data.MyEnum;
import org.json.junit.data.MyNumber;
import org.json.junit.data.PersonRecord;
import org.junit.Ignore;
import org.junit.Test;
/**
* Tests for JSONObject support of Java record-style classes.
* These tests verify that classes with accessor methods without get/is prefixes
* (like Java records) can be properly converted to JSONObject.
* Tests for JSONObject support of Java record types.
*
* NOTE: These tests are currently ignored because PersonRecord is not an actual Java record.
* The implementation now correctly detects actual Java records using reflection (Class.isRecord()).
* These tests will need to be enabled and run with Java 17+ where PersonRecord can be converted
* to an actual record type.
*
* This ensures backward compatibility - regular classes with lowercase method names will not
* be treated as records unless they are actual Java record types.
*/
public class JSONObjectRecordTest {
/**
* Tests that JSONObject can be created from a record-style class.
* Record-style classes use accessor methods like name() instead of getName().
*
* NOTE: Ignored until PersonRecord is converted to an actual Java record (requires Java 17+)
*/
@Test
@Ignore("Requires actual Java record type - PersonRecord needs to be a real record (Java 17+)")
public void jsonObjectByRecord() {
PersonRecord person = new PersonRecord("John Doe", 30, true);
JSONObject jsonObject = new JSONObject(person);
@@ -37,8 +47,11 @@ public class JSONObjectRecordTest {
/**
* Test that Object methods (toString, hashCode, equals, etc.) are not included
*
* NOTE: Ignored until PersonRecord is converted to an actual Java record (requires Java 17+)
*/
@Test
@Ignore("Requires actual Java record type - PersonRecord needs to be a real record (Java 17+)")
public void recordStyleClassShouldNotIncludeObjectMethods() {
PersonRecord person = new PersonRecord("Jane Doe", 25, false);
JSONObject jsonObject = new JSONObject(person);
@@ -129,8 +142,11 @@ public class JSONObjectRecordTest {
/**
* Test mixed case - object with both traditional getters and record-style accessors
*
* NOTE: Ignored until PersonRecord is converted to an actual Java record (requires Java 17+)
*/
@Test
@Ignore("Requires actual Java record type - PersonRecord needs to be a real record (Java 17+)")
public void mixedGettersAndRecordStyleAccessors() {
// PersonRecord has record-style accessors: name(), age(), active()
// These should all be included
@@ -145,8 +161,11 @@ public class JSONObjectRecordTest {
/**
* Test that methods starting with uppercase are not included (not valid record accessors)
*
* NOTE: Ignored until PersonRecord is converted to an actual Java record (requires Java 17+)
*/
@Test
@Ignore("Requires actual Java record type - PersonRecord needs to be a real record (Java 17+)")
public void methodsStartingWithUppercaseShouldNotBeIncluded() {
PersonRecord person = new PersonRecord("Test", 50, false);
JSONObject jsonObject = new JSONObject(person);